joanne-vermeulen
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
I agree Daniel, time to go. The AIIC at the moment does nothing obvious for the members. The only reason I am still a member is because I like access to the forum where I can come for advice and help – Linked in can do that for me. The AIIC does not seem to have a leading industry position and does not seem awfully well respected – just my opinion of course, but perception is everything.
1 second ditchroberts vote of no confidence
Like Jo said, we are not electricians and can only state with certainty that the bulbs are not working. Do not reference the landlords comments in your report as it would show bias. If you want to be fair/cover yourself, state that if the lights remain non working once bulbs have been changed, an electrician is to be asked to inspect, identify the issue then make good. 9 times out of ten it wont be the switches but the transformer which is definitely as landlord issue
Hi – no I don’t and would not. My agents don’t ask me to as this is/should part of their management of the property for which they are being paid. The most I will do is advise a tenant to run cleaning cycles through washing machines and dishwashers if the property has been empty for awhile. sounds a bit “jobsworthy” I know, but as clerks we do quite enough for the agents we work with.🤣🤣🤣
I am old school- I used a tape based dictating system until 2018. I still use the dictaphone and camera simply cos I prefer it. Gives me flexibility – can’t see me changing.
I send mine to the instructing party but will also send to tenant if agent or landlord does not forward a copy themselves. Don’t send as a matter of course
After 7 years one would expect to have to redecorate so the colour chosen by the tenant, in my opinion, would be a moot point. However, to cover yourself, perhaps suggest a nominal charge towards the cost of redecorating if it takes more than to cover dark grey paint, but it would need to be nominal. The way DPS are awarding nowadays, the landlord would get nothing if the tenant disputed the charge
You might also suggest a 2nd inspection may be required once all belongings have been removed to ensure all damage, clean and unseen wear and tear can be detailed, but not sure how that would work in terms of awarding to landlord from deposit. although, I suspect the tenants wont be getting any of their deposit back in this instance 😂😂
hiya
Just make it clear in your notes/summary that due to the possessions in place, possible damage and additional cleaning may only come to light once all possessions have been removed and you cannot be held liable for any damage not seen whilst belongings were still in situ. protect yourself as you don’t want to be held liable for anything missed due to furniture etc being in place.
Like Brian I have been using HCC Tokyo for a few years. My insurance is steady and it you need to make changes like I did recently, it was quick and simple. Highly recommend
as to EL – contractors have their own PL and PI so you should not need it. It is, and I am open to correction only for direct employee, If in doubt, ask your broker
You are right Karen – don’t doubt yourself 🙂